The IDE Wars: A History of Java's Most Important Tools
For a developer, the Integrated Development Environment (IDE) is more than a tool; it’s the command center, the workshop, and the canvas. The history of Java is inseparable from the history of its IDEs, a story filled with corporate strategy, open-source idealism, fierce competition, and a relentless push for developer productivity.
Alternate Diagram
Act I: The Early Titans (Late 90s)
In the early days of Java, development was often done in simple text editors and compiled on the command line. The first true IDEs were often expensive, proprietary, and slow. The undisputed king of this era was Borland’s JBuilder. With its powerful visual designer for Swing UIs and robust debugging tools, it dominated the professional market. Other players like IBM’s VisualAge for Java and early open-source projects like Kawa also existed, but JBuilder was the tool to beat.
Act II: The Open-Source Revolution (2001-2004)
The turn of the millennium brought a seismic shift. The proprietary IDE market was about to be completely disrupted by two major open-source projects backed by industry giants.
IBM’s Gambit: Eclipse
In November 2001, IBM made a stunning move. It took its internal Java tooling, invested a reported $40 million in cleaning it up, and released it as an open-source project called Eclipse. It then formed the Eclipse Consortium with other vendors to govern its development. Eclipse’s masterstroke was its pluggable architecture. Everything was a plugin. This made it an incredibly flexible platform, not just for Java, but for any language. Its use of the native OS widget toolkit (SWT) also made its UI feel fast and responsive compared to the pure Java (Swing) alternatives.
Sun’s Answer: NetBeans
Not to be outdone, Sun Microsystems had acquired a Czech student project called NetBeans in 1999 and open-sourced it in 2000. NetBeans became Sun’s official IDE for the Java platform. It was a showcase for Swing and was deeply integrated with all the latest Java technologies. For years, the “IDE Wars” were largely fought between the Eclipse and NetBeans camps, each with its passionate followers.
Act III: The Rise of a New Contender (2001-Present)
While the open-source giants battled, a small company from Prague, Czech Republic, named JetBrains released IntelliJ IDEA 1.0 in January 2001. Initially a paid commercial product, it gained a devoted following by focusing relentlessly on one thing: developer productivity.
IntelliJ introduced groundbreaking features that are now standard everywhere: powerful code inspections, intelligent refactorings that just worked, and deep code analysis that felt almost magical. In 2009, JetBrains released the free IntelliJ IDEA Community Edition, making its core features accessible to everyone. This move, combined with Google’s decision in 2013 to build Android Studio on top of the IntelliJ platform, cemented its position as a dominant force in the Java world.
Act IV: The Modern Era and the Lightweight Disruptor
Today, the Java IDE landscape is a mature market largely dominated by the “Big Two” for heavy-duty enterprise development: IntelliJ IDEA (for productivity and features) and Eclipse (for its vast plugin ecosystem and flexibility). NetBeans remains a solid, capable IDE, now under the stewardship of the Apache Foundation.
However, a new player has changed the game for many developers: Microsoft’s Visual Studio Code, released in 2015.
VS Code is not a traditional IDE; it’s a lightweight, fast, and highly extensible code editor. Its rise coincided with the growth of polyglot microservices, where a developer might work on Java, Python, and JavaScript in the same week. Through powerful extensions from Red Hat and Microsoft, powered by the Language Server Protocol (LSP), VS Code has become a surprisingly capable environment for Java development. It excels at quick edits, smaller projects, and for developers who prefer a more minimalist setup.
The journey of the Java IDE reflects the journey of Java itself: from proprietary beginnings to an open-source explosion, followed by a focus on refined user experience and, finally, adaptation to a new, multi-language world.